Night Of The Living Dead 1990 Navigationsmenü
Die Rückkehr der Untoten ist ein Horrorfilm von Tom Savini aus dem Jahr Er basiert auf dem gleichnamigen Film von George A. Romero aus dem Jahr , der in Deutschland unter dem Titel Die Nacht der lebenden Toten erschienen ist. Die. Die Rückkehr der Untoten (Originaltitel: Night of the Living Dead) ist ein Horrorfilm von Tom Savini aus dem Jahr Er basiert auf dem gleichnamigen Film. gardabaldo.eu - Kaufen Sie NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD () - NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD () (1 DVD) günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden. Genre: Horror - Land / Jahr: USA - Regie: Tom Savini - Drehbuch: John A. Russo, George A. Romero. In this recreation of Romero's cult classic NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD, seven strangers find themselves trapped in an isolated farmhouse while menacing. Night of the Living Dead (). USA Eigentlich wollten sie nur ihre tote Mutter auf dem Friedhof besuchen, doch dann werden Barbara und Johnnie von. Von Tom Savini. Mit Tony Todd, Patricia Tallman, Tom Towles, McKee Anderson, William Butler und Katie Finneran.
Still, despite the many missteps of this severely compromised version, Night of the Living Dead manages to distinguish itself as one of the more effective horror remakes out there.
Freeland concludes that the original film's depiction of Barbara makes for better cinema, and the more feminist-friendly update of Barbara is too derivative of standard " final girl " tropes.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Night of the Living Dead Theatrical release poster. John A. Russo Russell Streiner. Tony Todd Patricia Tallman.
Release date. Running time. British Board of Film Classification. Retrieved August 18, Los Angeles Times.
Retrieved Box Office Mojo. III June 15, The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, Dread Central.
Retrieved March 11, Chicago Sun-Times. December 31, Entertainment Weekly. The Washington Post. Chicago Tribune. Rotten Tomatoes.
Bloody Disgusting. October 22, DVD Talk. DVD Verdict. The Case of the Two Barbras". Retrieved May 11, View All Videos View All Photos Movie Info.
For reasons unknown, the recently deceased are rising from the grave as flesh-hungry zombies. Fleeing from the undead horde, a small group of survivors, including Barbara Patricia Tallman , Ben Tony Todd and Harry Tom Towles , sequester themselves in a remote farmhouse.
With the zombies outside the house multiplying, tensions flare, as the group argues over the best way to escape their increasingly dire situation before they are overrun completely.
Tom Savini. John A. Feb 25, Surround, Stereo, Ultra-Stereo. Tony Todd Ben. Patricia Tallman Barbara. Tom Towles Harry Cooper. McKee Anderson Helen Cooper.
William Butler Tom. Katie Finneran Judy Rose. Bill Mosley Johnnie. Heather Mazur Sarah Cooper. Tom Savini Director.
Menahem Golan Executive Producer. George A. Romero Executive Producer. Russo Producer. Russell Streiner Executive Producer. Paul McCollough Original Music.
Frank Prinzi Cinematographer. Tom Dubensky Film Editor. Cletus Anderson Production Design. James Feng Art Direction. October 29, Rating: A Full Review….
October 28, Rating: 2. October 2, Full Review…. July 3, Rating: C- Full Review…. View All Critic Reviews Feb 11, Two big fat gold stars for Tom Savini's peerless practical effects work.
A big fat zero for literally everything else in this exceptionally pointless remake. Gimly M Super Reviewer. Mar 26, This is a pretty good remake.
I've seen the original Night of the Living Dead, but it was so long ago that I don't even remember much of it, so that'll have to be rectified as the original film is on Netflix.
But from what I can remember, this is a pretty faithful remake with a few tweaks here and there, mostly Patricia Tallman's character almost a ripoff of Ripley from the Alien films.
She undergoes a transformation throughout the film, from weak to badass, whereas Ripley was just badass right from the start.
The ending, while different from the original, still has that social commentary that Romero was known for.
While the original had the civil rights struggle as the undercurrent for its ending, this film makes the use of the inhumanity that arises itself when the zombies are "defeated" at the end of the film.
The humans are just as bad, if not worse, than the zombies themselves because the humans take great pride in killing, torturing, and burning all the zombies.
They're doing this completely while being completely cognizant of their actions. The zombies do the things they do because they pretty much have no other choice, almost as if they were animals So I think the film captures that inhumanity quite well actually.
With this film being so faithful to the original film, even down to the very minimal gore, particularly at this point where Romero had amped up the amount of gore and films like the Return of the Living Dead were also gore-heavy, it's a credit to this film's crew to show such restraint.
Because of that, it's probably, while a good film in its own right, not gonna be as fondly remembered or as sought out because of that very reason.
Not that I have anything against this restraint that was shown, because I found the stuff inside the house to actually be pretty compelling, because, while the characters themselves were one dimensional, the interactions between them were pretty interesting and seeing the struggle Ben and Mr.
Cooper inside the house to do what's best for everybody involved. Again, one dimensional, but I liked it.
On top of that with the ending, that I thought was good and pretty smart, you have a pretty good, if not particularly memorable, remake on your hands.
Jesse O Super Reviewer. Oct 01, The original Night of the Living Dead is warmly embrace by audiences even to this day entertaining and frightening viewers.
It introduced the template that started an entire sub genre of zombie films yet few have surpassed it near perfect execution.
The question being how does one remake a film that created the blueprint for an entire sub genre? Personally I have no idea how one would do that successfully and neither do the filmmakers behind this remake who failed to bring originality to a game changing film.
Night of the Living Dead is about a group of people hiding from bloodthirsty zombies in a farmhouse. Anyone who seen the original will be turned off how closely this remake resembles the original.
It's a textbook definition of a by the number remake where the only good narratives elements come from the original. Things start off badly upon the first few minute spending time with an annoying character torturing you as long as he can before he dies.
Specific changes like the lack of radio and television broadcast detract from scope. We're not given much of an idea of how big the epidemic is when thrown into it.
The message delivery is muddled and ultimately lost because of the new characters changes. In the original "Night of the Living Dead" we had normal people working together for survival even if their differences wanted them to kill each other.
Acting like real people second guessing if their action were the right one. In this remake we have seven bickering characters dictating for others to follow their rule.
Characters are nothing more than a heavy handed representation of failure to remove yourself from hysteria in a dire situation leading to demise.
Most upsetting is it even more backhanded ending aiming to enlighten that perhaps the living is no better than the walking dead.
This falls short when you see the characters disregarding common rationalize for an action hero approach in a horror situation. One major upgrade was giving the women larger roles, but even that backfires.
Barbara for example goes from being a helpless damsels to an insane killing machine I mean plot device.
Her character is only here to attempt to bring originality in a film that fails to recognize the difference between change and laziness.
As the terrified little group fights for their lives, they begin to find themselves as plagued by the evil lurking within as by the ravening flesh-eaters battering on hastily boarded-up windows and doors.
The film kick-started the zombie horror sub-genre, proved to be the most profitable horror film of all time when it was released, has spawned countless imitators, remakes, and sequels, and has influenced generations of filmmakers.
Whether it's in black and white or colorized, it's a film that deserves respect as an innovative force that changed movie history. None of those reasons are why the film has more home video releases than possibly any other film in existence Romero almost fifty years of lost royalties.
In , Romero revisited the film that made him famous, rewriting a script based off the one he and John A. Russo wrote, reworking some of the broader themes, and altering one of the characters dramatically, due to the blanket negative portrayal of women in the first film as victims, borderline catatonic and helpless.
Special effects pioneer Tom Savini would helm the remake, bringing with him a gorier set of sensibilities. The story told in 'Night of the Living Dead' is the most basic of its genre, another reason its appeal hasn't faded even to this day.
On a day no different than any other, the world is forever changed. For reasons unknown and unexplained, the recent dead have reanimated, their shambling remains feeding on the flesh of the living, their infectious bites spreading the condition.
A woman Patricia Tallman as Barbara and her brother Johnnie Bill Moseley unknowingly enter the most dangerous place in this new world, a mortuary, to visit their departed mother's grave, and soon discover the terror unfolding around the world.
With Johnnie killed in an attack by a risen body, Barbara finds herself holed up in a two story country home not too far away.
Survival, though, doesn't just involve avoiding the bite of the dead, as other humans seeking refuge prove incapable of setting aside differences to work for mutual survival.
I've never put too much stock into comparing the and versions of 'Night of the Living Dead,' as I see both as essential entries into the zombie annuls.
The changes between films, as such, do not disturb me as much as they might other fans of the franchise. There's much to appreciate with this remake, even if it lacks the cultural relevancy and important undertones that the original was so thickly cast in.
Sure, the allegory for racial relations in the film is not a driving factor or even implied message in the remake, not so much as the basic selfish human nature on display, where the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many.
If anything, the climax is an interesting note, where the two opposing sides in the human struggle find themselves in the opposite place from where they were fighting before, a subtlety that shows both sides essentially admitting fault in their altercation.
Horror icon Tony Todd is a very competent replacement for Duane Jones as Ben, his deep, soothing yet ominous voice fitting the urgency of the character, particularly in his struggle with fellow survivor Harry Cooper Tom Towles , playing the heel role in a manner that makes viewers loathe him, a sign that his performance is also on the money.
The younger leads William Butler as Tom, Katie Finneran as Judy Rose prove to be more annoying than anything, with Tom's wishy-washy demeanor and Judy Rose's inability to do anything but screech and scream turning the characters into jokes.
Talman's Barbara is a likable, relatable lead, an every-woman thrust into extraordinary circumstances, who overcomes her fears to become extraordinary herself.
This new representation of the character is a little over the top at times, sure, but definitely makes for a more entertaining viewing experience.
Unlike Gus Van Sant's butchering of a legend , Savini and Romero work out a film that is a kind of homage to a classic, one that is more accessible to younger audiences, yet doesn't alienate the existing fans as much as many remakes do.
Perhaps the story is less scary and sinister in this adaptation, more aimed at survival horror than general terror. This remake definitely could have been terrible, but it avoided all the dangerously stupid pratfalls that most revisions fall for.
It's not quite a classic in its own right, but this adaptation can certainly be seen as more than a guilty pleasure, a fan favorite that may one day be put on the same level as its predecessor.
The iteration of 'Night of the Living Dead' went the opposite route of the film, when it comes to Blu-ray.
This disc, only available through the Screen Archives site, became the first title from the company to sell out in its pre-release window, driving market price up exponentially.
Unlike past Twilight Time titles, though, 'Night of the Living Dead' did not come with a magnet for the first X amount of buyers, though it does include the brief booklet inside the case.
The Blu-ray disc itself is a Region A marked BD25, with no annoying pre-menu content or packaging variations of any kind. The menu is static and silent.
I would be lying if I said that I haven't been keeping track of the melodrama surrounding this particular Blu-ray release.
In fact, I'll admit to sitting back and enjoying the hysteria unfold. I'm well aware of the issues that supposedly taint this Blu-ray disc and have turned it into one of the biggest disc controversies of the year, and I went into my viewing with this information in mind, though my mind had yet to be made up.
Night Of The Living Dead 1990 Then & Now Entries Video
NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (Full Movie) - Duane Jones - Judith O'Dea - TCC AI ColorNight Of The Living Dead 1990 - Inhaltsverzeichnis
Der Film war der Debütfilm für Tom Savini. Es existiert jedoch ein Workp rint , der zeigt, wie viele teils detailliert e Szen en entfernt w erden musste. Filmtyp Spielfilm. It's certainly not as worthy of moans and groans as that "moan and groan" pun I just made, no matter how much Tom Savini tries by putting today's more Broadchurch Staffel 4 filmmaking sensibilities 1000 Küsse the not too terribly good use of only advancing the original's b-movie sensibilities. Retrieved February 13, The film shows him cutting through the 2x4 on the inside of the door even though the hole in door shows he should have clearly cut through it already. Log In. Metacritic Reviews. This disc, only available through the Screen Archives site, became the first title from the company to sell Schlagzeugmafia in its pre-release window, driving market price up exponentially. Later scenes with them Pitch Perfect Watch Online show her hair a stunning orange, his shirt a clean white, but that isn't apparent until the shot of the moon designating the sun has set. I'm always wary of remakes of horror and science fiction classics as they are almost always inferior to the original versions, in many cases REALLY Die Bestimmung 3 Movie4k. Stupid characters that rush into every Devdas without putting much thought even Lebensmüde horror movie standards having a Mord In Fjällbacka: Das Familiengeheimnis shoot a locked gas pump with a shotgun at close range is idiotic. Michael A. Bewerte : 0. Leider habe ich auch nur die engl. Gekürzte Fassungen in Deutschland. Korrektur savini for Life!!! Remake von Mark Salling Glee.Night Of The Living Dead 1990 - Wir suchen Unterstützung
Im Bild des filmverrückten Idealisten, dem die Tücken des Marktes zum Verhängnis wurden, fand Romero immerhin ein sinnstiftendes Image, das er bis zum heutigen Tage pflegt. Romero war jedoch nicht sonderlich von dem fertigen Film begeistert und verweigerte jegliche Kooperation bei der Vermarktung. Wie meinen?Night Of The Living Dead 1990 Special-Kategorien
Zensurjahr Filme Zensurjahr Filme Monica Bellucci 2019 Document of the Dead Neu im Handel Neu im Verleih. Ticker Reviews. Kenne leider keines dieser Beispiele weder original noch remake aber ist abgespeichert, savini die Life! Genauso wie The Punisher von Platz Night of the Living Dead () ▻ Part 1: Platz ▻ Top 20 - Uncut-Fassungen, die niemals erschienen sind ▻ Alles zum Thema. Schnittberichte, News (z.B. Uncut-DVDs & Blu-rays) und Reviews zu Die Rückkehr der Untoten (OT: Night of the living Dead | USA, | Horror, Splatter). Die Uncut-Version der er-„Night Of The Living Dead“ wurde in Deutschland bislang weder auf Blu-ray noch auf DVD offiziell veröffentlicht. Die Rückkehr der Untoten - Night Of The Living Dead ein Film von Tom Savini mit Tony Todd, Patricia Tallman. Inhaltsangabe: Eigentlich.
Kritik Tata.To Filme Kostenlos Neu im Handel Forum. Produktionsjahr Film-News Spiele-News. Team Kontakt. Index-News Sonstige News. Index-News Sonstige News. Die Nacht der lebenden Toten. If anything, the climax is an interesting note, where the two opposing sides in the human struggle find themselves in the opposite place from where they were fighting before, a subtlety that shows both sides essentially admitting fault in their altercation.
Horror icon Tony Todd is a very competent replacement for Duane Jones as Ben, his deep, soothing yet ominous voice fitting the urgency of the character, particularly in his struggle with fellow survivor Harry Cooper Tom Towles , playing the heel role in a manner that makes viewers loathe him, a sign that his performance is also on the money.
The younger leads William Butler as Tom, Katie Finneran as Judy Rose prove to be more annoying than anything, with Tom's wishy-washy demeanor and Judy Rose's inability to do anything but screech and scream turning the characters into jokes.
Talman's Barbara is a likable, relatable lead, an every-woman thrust into extraordinary circumstances, who overcomes her fears to become extraordinary herself.
This new representation of the character is a little over the top at times, sure, but definitely makes for a more entertaining viewing experience.
Unlike Gus Van Sant's butchering of a legend , Savini and Romero work out a film that is a kind of homage to a classic, one that is more accessible to younger audiences, yet doesn't alienate the existing fans as much as many remakes do.
Perhaps the story is less scary and sinister in this adaptation, more aimed at survival horror than general terror.
This remake definitely could have been terrible, but it avoided all the dangerously stupid pratfalls that most revisions fall for.
It's not quite a classic in its own right, but this adaptation can certainly be seen as more than a guilty pleasure, a fan favorite that may one day be put on the same level as its predecessor.
The iteration of 'Night of the Living Dead' went the opposite route of the film, when it comes to Blu-ray. This disc, only available through the Screen Archives site, became the first title from the company to sell out in its pre-release window, driving market price up exponentially.
Unlike past Twilight Time titles, though, 'Night of the Living Dead' did not come with a magnet for the first X amount of buyers, though it does include the brief booklet inside the case.
The Blu-ray disc itself is a Region A marked BD25, with no annoying pre-menu content or packaging variations of any kind. The menu is static and silent.
I would be lying if I said that I haven't been keeping track of the melodrama surrounding this particular Blu-ray release. In fact, I'll admit to sitting back and enjoying the hysteria unfold.
I'm well aware of the issues that supposedly taint this Blu-ray disc and have turned it into one of the biggest disc controversies of the year, and I went into my viewing with this information in mind, though my mind had yet to be made up.
After one sitting with the film, I can say that, yes, there is a problem. That said, I do not believe it to be an issue worthy of a full recall, although I will plainly admit the issue on this disc will affect its market value and prevent it from being a highly sought-after collector's item like 'Fright Night' before it.
I will also admit the issue affected how it was scored, though not as dramatically as some may assume. The disc has its shares of ups and downs, regardless of if one finds issue with the infamous tint or not.
Detail levels are not entirely consistent; this can be seen in facial features, and foreground and background objects alike grass blades particularly.
Some of the issues with detail may be due to some minor DNR application, and considering Twilight Time doesn't remaster the films provided to them for distribution, it's entirely likely this is baked in.
There are moments in that just don't feel right, like Tom's denim-ish jacket, which looks painted on, lacking any texture whatsoever, at times almost floating, and Ben's pinstriped shirt sees the vertical lines unnaturally fade in a few shots.
There are also patches of skin that just look awkward, sometimes visible in Ben's stubble, Tom's smoother cheeks, or even on Barbara's face that don't appear to be makeup.
There are a few minor splashes of noise, and a couple of bits where it looks like edges are a little less than natural, with an outlined appearance, most particularly the shot of the trees in the first shot when the siblings exit their vehicle.
Now, that all sounds bad, but there are positives, I swear. I was regularly impressed with the amount of stray hairs, and how clearly they stand out, on top of a few cute bits of peach fuzz popping off Barbara's features.
Skin tones and colors are natural and strong There's solid depth of picture regularly, and there's nary a bit of banding or artifacting, or any other compression artifact throughout the entire runtime of the film.
All that leaves us to talk about is the blue tint For those who aren't fully aware, this disc was shipped out early by Screen Archives, the distributor for Twilight Time products, and as soon as it found its way into the hands of consumers, the gripes began to hit the net.
It didn't take long, because the issue is found in a very early part of the film. A number of scenes are heavily tinted blue, removing any natural hues, to create a darker, more ominous tone, visually.
As of the publication of this review, there has not been an official statement as to what exactly happened, but needless to say, it does affect the viewing experience.
Take, for example, the first scenes of Ben and Barbara inside the house. Later scenes with them will show her hair a stunning orange, his shirt a clean white, but that isn't apparent until the shot of the moon designating the sun has set.
For a short period of time, the picture looks blue in its entirety. Even exterior shots in the affect sequences look ominous, unnaturally overcast.
Whatever and whoever caused this, all that matters is that once it's seen, it can't be unseen. It's also odd that skin tones return to normal once night truly begins.
Am I happy with the product I paid a handsome fee for? Honestly, no. The product inside this expensive package belongs in a budget bin, not a high end collector's line.
The audio for 'Night of the Living Dead' also has come with some minor controversies, though they apparently require someone who is very familiar with the film to catch, but, like the video, we'll save the details on that for last.
Dialogue is clear and very clean, with natural fades and surges in volume, without even the slightest bit of lost information under more hectic scenes.
When the moaning gets louder, the hammering surges in urgency, and the score equally swells, dialogue remains very understandable, which is an accomplishment indeed.
Rears get some very minor ambiance, but are mostly present for a very powerful score bleed. Bass pops its head up as an atmospheric effect and increases in urgency as the film rolls on, for a nice added bump, albeit a light one.
The film features solid directionality later in the runtime, as the surrounding zombie horde's banging and thumping does come across from numerous angles properly.
And now, the controversy. Some sound effects found on the DVD are no longer present in this Blu-ray edition. Bill Mosley Johnnie.
Heather Mazur Sarah Cooper. Tom Savini Director. Menahem Golan Executive Producer. George A. Romero Executive Producer. Russo Producer. Russell Streiner Executive Producer.
Paul McCollough Original Music. Frank Prinzi Cinematographer. Tom Dubensky Film Editor. Cletus Anderson Production Design. James Feng Art Direction.
October 29, Rating: A Full Review…. October 28, Rating: 2. October 2, Full Review…. July 3, Rating: C- Full Review….
View All Critic Reviews Feb 11, Two big fat gold stars for Tom Savini's peerless practical effects work. A big fat zero for literally everything else in this exceptionally pointless remake.
Gimly M Super Reviewer. Mar 26, This is a pretty good remake. I've seen the original Night of the Living Dead, but it was so long ago that I don't even remember much of it, so that'll have to be rectified as the original film is on Netflix.
But from what I can remember, this is a pretty faithful remake with a few tweaks here and there, mostly Patricia Tallman's character almost a ripoff of Ripley from the Alien films.
She undergoes a transformation throughout the film, from weak to badass, whereas Ripley was just badass right from the start.
The ending, while different from the original, still has that social commentary that Romero was known for. While the original had the civil rights struggle as the undercurrent for its ending, this film makes the use of the inhumanity that arises itself when the zombies are "defeated" at the end of the film.
The humans are just as bad, if not worse, than the zombies themselves because the humans take great pride in killing, torturing, and burning all the zombies.
They're doing this completely while being completely cognizant of their actions. The zombies do the things they do because they pretty much have no other choice, almost as if they were animals So I think the film captures that inhumanity quite well actually.
With this film being so faithful to the original film, even down to the very minimal gore, particularly at this point where Romero had amped up the amount of gore and films like the Return of the Living Dead were also gore-heavy, it's a credit to this film's crew to show such restraint.
Because of that, it's probably, while a good film in its own right, not gonna be as fondly remembered or as sought out because of that very reason.
Not that I have anything against this restraint that was shown, because I found the stuff inside the house to actually be pretty compelling, because, while the characters themselves were one dimensional, the interactions between them were pretty interesting and seeing the struggle Ben and Mr.
Cooper inside the house to do what's best for everybody involved. Again, one dimensional, but I liked it. On top of that with the ending, that I thought was good and pretty smart, you have a pretty good, if not particularly memorable, remake on your hands.
Jesse O Super Reviewer. Oct 01, The original Night of the Living Dead is warmly embrace by audiences even to this day entertaining and frightening viewers.
It introduced the template that started an entire sub genre of zombie films yet few have surpassed it near perfect execution.
The question being how does one remake a film that created the blueprint for an entire sub genre? Personally I have no idea how one would do that successfully and neither do the filmmakers behind this remake who failed to bring originality to a game changing film.
Night of the Living Dead is about a group of people hiding from bloodthirsty zombies in a farmhouse. Anyone who seen the original will be turned off how closely this remake resembles the original.
It's a textbook definition of a by the number remake where the only good narratives elements come from the original. Things start off badly upon the first few minute spending time with an annoying character torturing you as long as he can before he dies.
Specific changes like the lack of radio and television broadcast detract from scope. We're not given much of an idea of how big the epidemic is when thrown into it.
The message delivery is muddled and ultimately lost because of the new characters changes. In the original "Night of the Living Dead" we had normal people working together for survival even if their differences wanted them to kill each other.
Acting like real people second guessing if their action were the right one. In this remake we have seven bickering characters dictating for others to follow their rule.
Characters are nothing more than a heavy handed representation of failure to remove yourself from hysteria in a dire situation leading to demise.
Most upsetting is it even more backhanded ending aiming to enlighten that perhaps the living is no better than the walking dead.
This falls short when you see the characters disregarding common rationalize for an action hero approach in a horror situation.
One major upgrade was giving the women larger roles, but even that backfires. Barbara for example goes from being a helpless damsels to an insane killing machine I mean plot device.
Her character is only here to attempt to bring originality in a film that fails to recognize the difference between change and laziness. As a standalone horror film it falls prey to the trapping of horror conventions.
The main issue with the film is jumping for scares without buildup. Everything is rushed from character development and pacing that it becomes exhausting.
Things that hold true to bad modern horror flick can be applied here. Containing an unnecessary one dimensional and forced unsympathetic villain creating non-conflicts.
Stupid characters that rush into every situation without putting much thought even by horror movie standards having a character shoot a locked gas pump with a shotgun at close range is idiotic.
Finally only one logical character that makes it out alive only to fall victim to what they experience changing them.
Lessening the fear and having the viewer gripping to their seats with frustration is too many zombie set pieces.
An overexposure to the creature that causes fear will diminish what fear it strikes. For an example of how it done correctly take a look at Jaws.
In Jaws it plays on your expectations whenever the shark was going to attack keeping you alert not knowing if it was the shark or just the ocean.
In this remake zombies are always in position to attack eliminating suspense. It fails to be a standalone piece of horror to stand apart form another generic zombie film and fails as a remake to do anything new with the material.
Acting is generally mixed. The actors seem to confuse shouting for dramatic delivery to the point of ludicrous. Whenever the actors are not shouting they are tolerable performing average at best.
Some imitating the original actors and others attempting to bring something refreshingly new to the remake.
The special effects when it comes to the zombies serve their purpose. There's certainly enough gross makeup effects to make you cringe.
Sadly the great make up effect are ruined when it comes the direction. Not everything will look effective in color as it does in black and white.
Often being too close to the zombies reveals the secret behind the illusion or to far exposing the visible weak points in the zombies strategy. Music is out of place all the time.
It score plays whenever character dialogue is minimal taking away immersion when there is a lack of silence.
Night of the Living Dead remake removes the brains ending up just as lifeless as the film creatures. Nothing in the film outshines anything in the original and even as a standalone piece it falls victim to many conventions to strike fear.
If it wasn't baring the same name as the beloved classic this would been long forgotten as nothing more than another generic horror flick with nothing interesting compared to what inspired it.
Caesar M Super Reviewer. Oct 23, Forget Dan O'Bannon, this is the real return of the dead, or, more specifically, return of the "Night of the Living Dead".
I kind of like the ironic idea of a film about about resurrected beings being remade, or rather, in and of itself resurrected, and lo and behold, here it is, and it's not too much to "moan and groan" about.
It's certainly not as worthy of moans and groans as that "moan and groan" pun I just made, no matter how much Tom Savini tries by putting today's more advanced filmmaking sensibilities to the not too terribly good use of only advancing the original's b-movie sensibilities.
I can't tell if it's because Savini forgot that "Night of the Living Dead" was one of your better b-movies or because he wanted to make up for "Night of the Living Dead" essentially being the only major early George Romero that he wasn't attached to, but either way, the point is that the Sultan of Splatter Isn't that a song by Dire Straits?
Granted, George A. Romero himself wrote the screenplay to this, and considering how much he's been undercutting his original vision in reason years, I doubt that he even remembers what his original intention was.
Eh, whatever, by , he still had enough juice in him to keep a film going through its faults for the most part. That being said, make no mistake, this film faces faults, and more than it should, many of which you may recognize a bit too much.
The original was an independent horror film of , and as you would imagine, much b-movie cheesiness ensued and rendered the final product rather underwhelming, yet for every drastic limitation in the film, there was a strength spawned from ambition and even a few sensibilities that were ahead of the game, and with this remake, while we're not facing a borderline spoof on competent filmmaking, we are faced with b-movie sensibilities whose being intentional is palpable enough to work to the film's advantage, to a certain degree, though not to where you can forgive certain b-movie sensibilities for slowing the film down more than keeping it going.
George Romero delivers a couple of overly cheesy moments in set piece conception and other areas of writing, while Paul McCollough delivers on some cheesy score work and a few performers deliver on some disconcerting acting faults, - whether they be intentional or not - and faults such as these supplement the rather cheesy atmosphere that Tom Savini establishes a touch too well at times, to where momentum slows down.
Further supplementation to the slowing of momentum comes from Tom Dubensky's editing, which is generally decent, and rarely faults for that matter, yet faults at times nevertheless, getting a bit too loose for certain moments of particular intrigue's own good, to where things drag along near-aimlessly and lose a bit of steam after a while.
Of course, it's not like the film has all that much steam to begin with, as the story really doesn't have a whole lot of bite to begin with, and when I say, "begin with", I mean the actual beginning of this story, as in the source material.
Bite limiting is a complaint that applies to the original, which is the point, because when you get down to it, this film's immense faithfulness is quite possibly its biggest problem.
The film certainly adds its fair share of unique touches, yet on the whole, things are a bit too familiar, which would have been just fine, seeing as how the original still had a reasonably strong story that went undercut by the limitations of the budget and time, thus giving this film the potential to succeed through more modern sensibilities where the original fell short, yet the problem is that this film, with all of its intentional b-movie sensibilities and other shortcomings, - both active and consequential - actually dilutes the worthiness of a story, yet not to where you can't recognize things enough to feel the potent lack of originality that goes into carrying this film beneath the quality of its somewhat underwhelming original, and by extension, to an underwhelming state.
However, this film, like its source material, doesn't fall too short, because although this film doesn't border on genuinely good as much as the original, it has its high points.
Though not especially stunning, nor with some of the unexpectedly cool shots that George Romero pulled when he shot the original, Frank Prinzi's cinematography remains pretty decent in its colorful detail that may be a touch too lively at times for a horror film of this type, yet generally catches your eye.
Again, Pinzi's photography isn't too terribly striking, yet it has a certain strength to it that generally keeps you from falling too far out of the film, though not quite as much as the intrigue, which is of course diluted by the films missteps, both intentional and unintentional, yet still has a certain kick to it that kicks along through out the film, going broken up by tension.
For this, some credit is due to George Romero's screenplay, which is tainted both by the faults that it held upon its inception and by its own right, yet still delivers on set pieces, both familiar and unique, that have some momentum to them, and keep intrigue pumping.
Of course, Romero doesn't just do a generally decent job at crafting set pieces and certain other areas of the film on paper, because in the big picture, while Romero's story strokes are even more improvable now than they were back in , this story remains decent, with themes that may not be as well-handled as they were in the original, yet still stand pronounced enough to get at you and leave you thinking a bit, intrigued.
Romero crafts an immensely flawed yet still reasonably decent reworking of his and John A. Russo's original vision, with person behind the intensification of the degree of effectiveness within Romero's screenplay being the man responsible for bring Romero's moderately adjusted vision to the screen, and by that, I don't just mean that director Tom Savini delivers on sharp makeup and special effects that bring the set pieces alive, largely because Savini didn't actually do the makeup and special effects on this film.
If nothing else, the final product is entertaining, and while it desperately needs to be more than simply that, it's hard to mind too much, because through thick and thin, the film comes out more charming and engaging than not.
At the end of the day, or rather, second night of the living dead, the film finds expected flaws in its staying to faithful as an homage to b-movie sensibilites, plummeting into cheesy moments that undercut momentum, though not as much as the slowness and overambitious over-faithfulness that make more glaring this story's being even more bland than it was upon its introduction in , thus making for an inferior remake to an underwhelming classic, yet one that doesn't fall too underwhelming either, having a kind of handsome style to it, as well as intrigue established through generally decent set pieces, plotting and other high points within George A.
Romero's screenplay, and brought to life by Tom Savini's flawed, yet generally effectively inspired direction, whose charming and entertainment value leaves Savini's "Night of the Living Dead" to stand as a watchable piece of fluff of a remake, even if it, like its original, could have been so much more.
Cameron J Super Reviewer. See all Audience reviews.
Gekürzte Fassungen in Deutschland. Neu im Handel Neu im Verleih. Ich kenn nur das Original bisher. Artikel Specials. Remake Andreas Gabalier Unplugged Night of the Living Dead 3D. Team Kontakt. The Crow - Die Krähe. Dort trifft sie auf Ben Tony Toddmit dem sie das Haus verbarrikadiert. Ähnliche Bs The Vampire Diaries. Wo bekomme ich diese Version bitte her?Night Of The Living Dead 1990 Menu de navegação Video
NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (Full Movie) - Duane Jones - Judith O'Dea - TCC AI Color
Sie hat die einfach glänzende Idee besucht